
If your childhood was anything like mine,
you've had the 3 R's - Reduce, Reuse, and Recycle - imprinted on your brain
(along with the names of the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles and the lyrics
to the Fresh Prince of Bel-Air intro) for as long as you can remember.
But today, there's another R in town that's even more important and
impactful: Rethink.
According to Roseland, "waste shouldn't and doesn't have to be a part of the consumption cycle." And if we start thinking about waste as an unnecessary byproduct and a human invention that can ultimately be eliminated, the inefficiencies of our current standard of living become vividly apparent and opportunities for effecting change appear in all manner of places.
Striving for a zero-waste society is an admirable goal and one that should be on everyone's agenda. There is, however, a lot of damage that has already been done and that should be considered in addition to rethinking the way we make things in the first place. Three ideas and interesting areas of development come to mind, all of which address slightly different stages of the rethinking process.
1.
Rethinking Mushrooms
One thing that should never be underestimated
is the power of Mother Nature to restore balance. While we pride
ourselves on finding new and better ways to create and invent products and
processes, we often overlook the astounding ideas that nature has had in place
for millions of years. Biomimicry seeks to study and learn from
these time-tested strategies and incorporate them into more sustainable methods
of advancing our society. Following this method of thought, what other
ways can natural processes be utilized to solve some of our self-inflicted
waste problems?
One fascinating discovery may provide a natural
solution to the problem of non-biodegradable discarded plastic which could
potentially be sitting in landfills for centuries. A group of students from Yale brought a fungus back from a trip to the Amazon that thrives on a diet of polyurethane in an
oxygen-free environment. In a global economy that produces 300 million
tons of plastic each year, a fungus that can survive in the conditions at the
bottom of a landfill and that feeds off of the landfill's contents is a very
promising idea indeed.
Additionally, a company called Ecovative has
combined mycelium, the sticky substance on the bottom of mushrooms, with corn
husks and other food byproducts to create a product similar to polystyrene
foam. This is the nasty stuff we see in packing materials, some takeout
food packaging, and insulation. Eliminating this product from our
environment poses major benefits not only for our landfills but for our oceans
as well as it is a major component of plastic debris threatening marine
wildlife.
2.
Rethinking Consumerism
"Armaments, universal debt, and planned
obsolescence - those are the three pillars of Western prosperity. If war,
waste, and moneylenders were abolished, you'd collapse. And while you
people are overconsuming the rest of the world sinks more and more deeply into
chronic disaster."
-Aldous Huxley, Island
"Advertising has us chasing cars and
clothes, working jobs we hate so we can buy shit we don't need."
-Tyler Durden, Fight Club
The first time I read about the Cradle to Cradle design concept, I thought it was the
answer to all of our problems. And while I question whether or not
McDonough Braungart Design Chemistry (MBDC) has succumbed to some of the
"less bad" principles they warn against in the implementation of
their product certifications, the theory behind their ideas can still provide a
useful framework for redefining the way we approach consumerism.
In particular, I am intrigued by the concept of
a 'product of service'. Essentially, McDonough and Braungart perceive a
system in which, "instead of assuming that all products are to be
bought, owned, and disposed of by 'consumers,' products containing valuable
technical nutrients . . . would be reconceived as services people want to enjoy
. . . . When they finish with the product, . . . the manufacturer
replaces it, taking the old model back, breaking it down, and using its complex
materials as food for new products." This type of economy is quite
different from our current ownership-based economic model, but the implications
and benefits for a society with an ever-increasing hunger for newer and better
products and technology shouldn't be ignored. If we can get past the norm
that what we own defines what we're worth, we have the opportunity to revolutionize
the way products are made and disposed of.
3.
Rethinking the Circle of Life
I couldn't resist...
Even in death, the most natural of processes, we have found ways to damage the environment. The current standard involves two main options - burial or cremation. But between non-biodegradable coffins, embalming liquid seeping into the ground, greenhouse gas emissions from the burning of corpses, and the inefficiencies of large plots of land left unusable for other endeavors, end-of-life decisions have lasting impacts long after our loved ones have left us.
A greener alternative to these traditional
methods is aquamation. This involves a process called
alkaline hydrolysis in which "a body is placed in a stainless-steel vat
containing a 200°F potassium-hydroxide-and-water solution for four hours until
all that remains is the skeleton." The bones are crushed and given
to the family while the remaining solution, which contains no DNA, can be
diluted by adding vinegar or citric acid and then recycled. It's even
safe enough to use to water plants! And the entire process uses only 5 to
10% of the energy required for cremation. If you can get past the logistics,
I think going back into the earth to create new life sounds like a pretty nice
way to leave one last positive mark on the world.
Reduce, Reuse,
Recycle, Rethink
Plastic-eating
fungi, a rental-based society, and aquamation are just a few intriguing ways to
rethink the way we reduce, reuse, and recycle. But we have a lot more
rethinking to do if we're to start living within the means of our planet and to
become a more natural, zero-waste society. Share your Rethinking ideas
below!

I first heard about this awesome fungi when I found the microbial kitchen on a design website. This awesomely redesigned zero-waste kitchen includes a "plastic upcycler": http://www.design.philips.com/philips/sites/philipsdesign/about/design/designportfolio/design_futures/microbial_home.page Check it out! My dream home.
ReplyDeleteA few years ago, I heard Dr. Dayna Baumeister from the Biomimicry Institute speak at a lecture series hosted by the University of Michigan. Really fascinating stuff. The following section of the Institute's website gives some interesting examples of biomimicry in action, many of which she went into detail on:
ReplyDeletehttp://biomimicry.net/about/biomimicry/a-biomimicry-primer/
There is a really good book my Mary Roach called "Stiff," which is about cadavers and all the things that might happen to our bodies after we've died. One chapter focuses on a new greener alternative to cremation, called tissue digestion. I don't think it is the same as what you referenced...this is basically boiling bodies in lye. The result is liquid that is safe to go down the drain, and bones that can be easily crumbled. She also discusses a biologist in Sweden who is working on a method to compost bodies (after they've been frozen with nitrogen and broken apart). Interesting stuff.
ReplyDelete1.I am a little freaked out about the thought of aquamation, but mostly because it sounds weird and is not the norm. I'm sure if we were not so solidified into our post-death options, it could be a possibility.
ReplyDelete2. On the note of rethinking, what popped into my head today were the new trash can labels. I do not know if this is actually new, or something I just started noticing, but a lot of trash cans now say "landfill" and then have a recycling bin next to them. That is such a different approach and I love it. You know exactly where that wrapper is going to end up. In the landfill. It is a great way to get people to understand where their trash is going. It is not just being hauled away to some mythical place.
Aquamation is definitely in interesting and more environmentally friendly idea, but I would like to see what percentage of American’s would be interested in pursuing this as an alternative to the traditional method of burial. Because in my opinion, this is definitely a sensitive topic for most people, which would foster a more difficult experience when trying to alter their perspective on this issue.
ReplyDeleteI too also love the ideas behind biomiciry. I’ve moderately addicted to Janine Benyus’ TEDtalks, I’ll just post two links if anyone is interested. Janine does a lot of work in biomicry, and these videos just talk a bit about the topic and have a bunch of interesting design ideas stemming from it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n77BfxnVlyc
http://www.ted.com/talks/janine_benyus_shares_nature_s_designs.html
Wow, a mushroom that eats plastics! That is amazing. I was at a 'health inspector conference' in town this week and a mycologist spoke about mushroom identification as there are some confusing restrictions on wild mushrooms for consumption in retail food establishments. He mentioned that there are 1000s upon 1000s of mushroom species that have not yet been described by science. Makes me wonder what else fungus could do as we rethink?
ReplyDeleteInteresting enough, there was also a presenter on green burials. While he did briefly mention and describe aquamation, he was obviously more interested in describing his own green burials that he offers in northwest Indiana. His green burials include the prohibition of formaldehyde, metals, concrete, and utilizes bio-degradable 'coffins', among a few other things. It's better than the alternative I guess. Here is the link to their natural burials and the Green Burial Council. http://www.hippensteelfuneralservice.com/naturalburial.php
http://www.greenburialcouncil.org/
Honestly, I do not believe that zero waste is obtainable. I think a more realistic goal should be set. Perhaps trying to reduce our waste by X% should be the first step and then attempt a zero waste society or city. To many people zero waste implies totally changing their lifestyles. By setting a smaller goal or commitment to later achieve a larger one is a concept we are familiar with (CBSM). Giving people a goal to reach such as a percentage seems like more people would want to participate. If you said that a person has to completely cut something out of their life it may discourage them from participating.
ReplyDeleteOne way natural processes can be utilized to solve environmental issues is the use of trees to capture and sequester carbon (http://www.epa.gov/sequestration/faq.html). I am very intrigued with the idea of this fungus breaking down plastic waste. It sounds similar to using bacteria in an anaerobic digester to breakdown food waste. I’m really interested how they linked the idea of combining corn and mycelium to produce useful products. That’s really cool!
Aquamation seems like it may be the future of how we manage the deceased. From the article it sounds like this is a much more sustainable technique than past methods. But what are they doing with the spent liquids? They say the used liquid “can” be recycled, but what are they really doing with it? Reusing it? Discharging it to a treatment plant? Or just dumping the waste liquid on rose bushes? Trust but verify! So, do you write it in your will that you want to be aquamated or does your family choose, or both? What are the regulations on burying a body in a field or releasing it into the ocean? These alternatives are more sustainable, but when it comes to loved ones you want to honor them and have a place to visit them from time to time. This may be the main hinderence that will prevent aquamation from becoming the preferred method of corpse management. I've never said those two words together before. Kind of weird.
Aquamation sounds really interesting. I wasn't really aware that there are more green ways to go. I think many people think the best way to go is in the most exclusive cemetery and in the most extravagant coffin they can afford. I guess consumerism is involved in all aspects of our lives, even death. It is probably unlikely that someone set on being buried in a coffin would consider aquamation, but perhaps someone who wants to be cremated may be open to aquamation since it is similar in that family members receive the crushed bones (rather than ashes).
ReplyDeleteAquamation kind of creeps me out, though that's because death creeps me out. But yay Lion King! And I just went on a bit of a rant about consumerism so I'll just bring it back to a simple thought about how 'back in the old days things used to be built to last' idea. I feel like that's the saying my grandfather used to make, but it's almost like it's still true for every new incarnation of products as technology rolls along. Continual use is hard enough when your neighbor or friend has the newest shiny version with a dozen 'better' things, but it becomes really hard to not buy new and discard the old when yours breaks so quickly.
ReplyDeleteI'm really interested by biomimicry, or rather highly amused by it. I think it's about time that we as a race have accepted that maybe Nature has a better, more efficient, and simpler way to do things than we with all our technology. Like we could attempt to quarantine an area of water, pump it out, filter out an oil spill and then refill the area or we could just use a living organism to clean up our oops moment. http://news.discovery.com/tech/oil-eating-microbes-gulf-oil-spill.html
And really, I've always thought the solution to making our solar panels more efficient (I believe they still only absorb in one color spectrum) was to use leaves as a study to determine how to use most (clearly not greens) colors in our solar power techniques.
Jae Rhim Lee ties the topics of two of your points together with her idea of a mushroom burial suit. Like many embalming/cremation alternatives, this one is a little out there, but it is an interesting idea nonetheless. Check out her TED talk here (http://www.ted.com/talks/jae_rhim_lee.html). Some people may also have seen her when she came to IU to speak last year.
ReplyDeleteThe two major barriers I can think of in altering our burial practices are religious and cultural. I wonder if community-based social marketing could make a dent in changing these social norms that many people hold so dear! Or, on the other hand, maybe these practices could be adjusted/framed so that they are more compatible with the norms we are used to.
Green burials are actually a strange and slightly morbid interest of mine since I first came across the idea in a pantheism newsletter a few years ago ( http://www.pantheism.net/pan/free/pan15s.pdf pg 12). I don't like the idea of having my body liquified, but I definitely hope when I go, I'm buried in a more natural way without all those chemicals and what not. Is it totally creepy that I actually think these ecopod caskets look really cool? http://www.ecopod.co.uk/
ReplyDeleteAquamation is a new topic for me. It definitely sounds interesting and is a good and easy? way to reduce energy usage. However, I'm not sure how many people would consider it. I wonder if it's not that popular because people are not aware of it or choose not to do so. I guess this is a strong matter of doing things the way they were traditionally done for most people.
ReplyDelete